Sometimes
I get asked why I write Sword & Sorcery, and why I have this
whole blog dedicated to it. There seems to be a pervasive idea that
S&S is essentially a juvenile medium, wallowing in sexist tropes
and quasi-racist archetypes that are only acceptable in light of the
time period when the genre was created. The thinking is that Sword &
Sorcery fiction is outdated, and is like Sword & Planet or
Edisonades – a relic of a bygone era, doomed to niche appeal to
only a small audience of enthusiasts.
Obviously,
I don’t feel that way or I wouldn’t be here. I am often
frustrated by the wider public view of Sword & Sorcery as an
immature genre that began and ended with Conan the Barbarian, and is
not allowed to grow and change. I even find a lot of fans fall into
this mindset, seeing the old works as the best, and not allowing as
much room for new innovations or directions.
Fans
are, of course, allowed to like what they like. I myself have a
shelf full of Howard collections, owning damned near everything the
man ever wrote several times over. I have my shelf of Moorcock and
Lovecraft and Burroughs and Brackett and Moore and Leiber – all the
greats of the old days have a place on my shelf. I am as guilty as
anyone of preferring the old ways.
But
the very success of the style in the early years worked against it.
After all, S&S started out as a pulp genre, and pulp it remains
even today. You can dress it up all you like, but the genre deals in
violence, iron-muscled heroes, and black-hearted villains. It lives
on pulp tropes, and you can’t really change that without making it
into something else.
Pulp
gets a bad rep these days. The association is that pulp means
“juvenile” when really, it was never a genre aimed at younger
readers, it was rather seen as more lurid and intended for adult
readers who liked action and excitement. Pulp is vivid and intense
by nature. It can use subtlety, but that’s not its main strength.
It stands in opposition to the slower, talkier high fantasies that
got more mainstream respect out of the gate. Not that it is their
enemy, but they are both doing very different kinds of things.
So
rather than wonder if a pulp genre has any place in the modern
landscape of genre literature, we should stop treating “pulp”
like a dirty word. Plenty of stuff is pulp, but just stopped calling
itself that because of the associations with trash literature. Star
Wars is pulpy as hell, Superhero movies are pulp, crime shows like
Breaking Bad are pulp. Pretty much 90% of all horror stories and
movies are pulp, and so are romances. Pulp means vividly giving the
readers what you know they want, and certain kinds of creators and
critics hate it.
There
was something in screenwriting that William Goldman called “The RX
Factor”, and by that he meant that a movie had a leg up on awards
if it was seen as “good for you” - in other words, a movie that
Teaches You Lessons or makes you think Deep Thoughts or is About The
Human Condition. There is a deep impulse in the American psyche that
feels like the arts should always be to elevate and improve people,
not just for fun.
And
yet pulp is supposed to be fun, first and foremost. Pulp is about
gratification. About giving you what you are here for, and there’s
a cleanliness and a purity to that. It’s not about subtle lessons,
or commentaries on the human condition or politics or any of that.
It may address those things – because writers put themselves and
the things they believe into their stories – but they are not the
reason it is here. Pulp is here to fucking entertain you.
Once
Sword & Sorcery was tarred with the pulp brush it never got free
of it, and all subsequent works were therefore dismissed out of hand
as not “real” literature. The clinging to the old masters has
done a lot to make this worse, and it is kind of an uphill battle for
new creators to make a name when a lot of the potential audience is
just here for the stuff they already know they like.
I
believe that S&S can be more than it has been, and there is
plenty of room for the genre to grow and evolve without losing sight
of what it is here for and what it does. I don’t mean that it
should stop being pulp, I just think we should be unafraid to say it
is pulp and that we like it that way. We should not bastardize S&S
by trying to make it “respectable”, but rather find out all the
things we can do with it while still keeping it bloody and fierce.
Sword & Sorcery should never be ashamed of what it is.