Released
in 1982, this movie was a complete flop and only became well-known,
and something of a cult classic, when it became ubiquitous on cable
throughout the 80s. To kids of my generation, this was one of their
early experiences with Sword & Sorcery, and maybe the very first.
It established in a lot of kid’s minds what the genre was supposed
to be, and it still inspires a lot of affection to this day.
Bizarrely,
this is actually based on a novel by Andre Norton, though is is
“loosely-based” in the sense of “having almost nothing to do
with it.” The novel is an SF work about a future Navajo who
communicates with animals, and Norton apparently asked that her name
not be associated with the film in any way. A pretty good call on
her part, as while I don’t think the credit would be completely
embarrassing, I don’t think she would have wanted to be well-known
for this.
I
hadn’t seen this movie for many, many years, so a return viewing
revealed a lot of things I had forgotten or not noticed. For one,
this is definitely a cut above other bargain-basement fare like
Amazon Queen or Quest for the Mighty Sword. The sets
look pretty good, the weapon props are solid, and the miniature work
is not bad at all. The outdoor vistas were shot in California, but
they manage not to look like it, and I was thinking they might have
filmed in Spain or Italy. Even the score, by veteran Lee Holdridge
(Splash, Moment by Moment) is pretty decent.
Another
thing that surprised me was the amount of grit there is in this.
It’s true that there is very little blood on screen, and the action
is choreographed so all the gore would not show on camera –
probably as a cost-saving measure as much as anything else – but
what is implied is still pretty intense. At the beginning one of the
evil witch-women (swimsuit models with repulsive old-age makeup on
their faces) paralyzes the king and queen in their bed while she cuts
out the queen’s unborn fetus. Nothing is shown, no blood at all,
but the way the scene is framed lets us see the horror in the
victim’s eyes as they watch, and it makes the scene gruesome
regardless.
Then
you have other touches, like the road to the city lined with people
impaled on stakes, guards in spiked leather driven mad by torture and
brain damage, and children sacrificed by throwing them into a roaring
fire, and you have a movie that manages to be pretty hardcore despite
the lack of overt blood and guts. Then there’s the race of
bat-people who eat by wrapping their wings around their prey and
digesting them into a pile of bones and green goo. Add in some brief
nudity and I am startled this movie got a PG rating – there’s no
way this would pass for even PG-13 now.
Marc
Singer isn’t really much of an actor, but that’s okay, as he is
mostly asked to be sinewy and mostly naked for this movie – this is
one of those fantasy kingdoms where nobody ever wears pants. He
handles the action scenes well enough, and he seems genuinely at ease
with the animals he is working with. That’s good, as they are
obviously not super well-trained. The tiger (painted black with
Clairol) is kind of surly, the ferrets were unmanageable and had to
be bribed with food, and the eagle was so famously difficult they
apparently had to get the high-flying shots by dropping it out of a
hot air balloon.
The
villains are pretty good here as well, with the silent, brutish chief
of the Jun Horde looking like Lord Humungous with bat wings on his
helmet, and Rip Torn having an absolutely great time chewing the
scenery as the fanatical, child-sacrificing evil priest Maax
(pronounced MAY-axe, of course.) Having two villains helps keep the
ending of the film from feeling flat, as just after the big throwdown
with Maax, the good guys then have to turn right around and deal with
the bestial Jun Horde. That battle scene – with masked warriors
riding through fire, then hacking and slashing while they are still
ON fire – makes for an exciting and visually spectacular climax,
just when a less ambitious movie would be winding down.
The
Beastmaster is not a great film by any real standard, but for
what it was trying to do, it did really well. This is just an
amped-up version of classic Saturday-afternoon fare like Goliath
and the Dragon, or Hercules in the Haunted World. The
script is not great, but it’s not painful. The storytelling is
workmanlike and competent, and the production value is actually
pretty good, certainly for a movie this cheap. Director Don
Coscarelli wanted to make maybe the ultimate fantasy movie for
weekend afternoons when nothing good is on, and he nailed it.
Adored this movie as a kid, even though some of those gritty scenes freaked me out, for most of the reasons you outlined. Weirdly good for an obviously cheap film.
ReplyDeleteI all ways sat down and watched it so ther must have been some thing great about it. LOL
ReplyDeleteIt's a very watchable film.
DeletePerhaps the animal handlers took their cue from Roar!
ReplyDeleteI have super fond memories of this movie. I really should sit down and watch it again.
~BatCheva
It's on Prime, if you have that.
DeleteSaw this at the drive-in back when they were a thing. Loved it, but still was very disappointed it wasn't an adaptation of Andre Norton's book.
ReplyDeleteI honestly didn't know it was adapted from a book at all until recently.
Delete