This
is almost undoubtedly the movie that got director Marcus Nispel the
gig to helm the 2011 Conan reboot that failed so miserably.
Nominally a remake of a 1987 Finnish film of the same name, it is
actually almost a completely different movie save for some elements
of the basic setup. With a strong cast including Karl Urban, Clancy
Brown, Moon Bloodgood and Russel Means, this had all the pieces to be
a solid mid-budget action film, and yet it somehow fails to come
together.
Karl
Urban plays Ghost, a man who was marooned as a child on the shores of
North America by a Viking ship and then left to be raised by the
Native Americans who found him. Despite having lived among the
natives, he is still held as an outcast by some of his tribe. Once
he has grown to adulthood, more Vikings turn up, led by the
villainous Clancy Brown as Gunnar, and Ghost has to use his knowledge
of his former people to defend the Native Americans from the savage
raiders.
It’s
a bloody film if you get the unrated version, though the theatrical
release was cut down for some unknown reason. There are impalements,
severed heads, stabbings and spilled entrails left and right. All
the blood and gore is, refreshingly, practical, rather than painted
on splashes of CGI red. People are shot with arrows, hacked up with
swords and axes, skewered on sharp stakes, and burned alive.
Nispel
is doing his best work here as a director, and that means he gets
some really gorgeous shots. They filmed in British Columbia, and
took great advantage of the snow-covered, mountainous vistas all
around. Nispel has a great eye for composition, and he uses light
and color to make really dramatic images. True, he abuses the
digital color correction pretty shamelessly, but it was 2007,
everybody was doing that.
As a
historical effort, the movie is a disaster. True, we know that the
Vikings visited North America long before the age of exploration, and
that they did battle with the people they called “skraelings”,
but we have no evidence that their entry into the New World was with
violent or rapacious intent. In fact, Viking raiders would never
have voyaged to the Americas when richer targets were much closer to
home. Explorers and colonists traveled to Greenland and later
Newfoundland, not reavers.
The
look of the Vikings in the movie is simultaneously outlandish and
awesome. Vikings never wore horned helmets, nor did they wear plate
armor. The Norsemen in Pathfinder are made into almost
inhuman monsters by their design, as if the director held up a print
of Frazetta’s Death Dealer and said “make it like this”.
They wear horned helmets with goggles that cover their eyes, so all
you see of most of them is a demonic helmet, a huge beard, and teeth.
The actors apparently wore football pads under their costumes to
make their armored shoulders look huge and intimidating. The swords
and axes look entirely fanciful, and spiked flails are used
prominently, when such weapons were never used by Vikings and in fact
may not have existed at all.
I
would be interested to see a Native take on the Amerindian people in
this movie, as they pretty much just seem like standard white
stereotypes. (The screenwriter, Laeta Kalogridis, is of Greek
ancestry) The movie does get points for casting actual native actors
and actresses, though the great Russel Means is criminally underused.
Most
of the problem is that Nispel, as a director, is not good at building
or maintaining tension. The movie is slow to start, and proceeds at
a lumpy, uneven pace throughout. He often uses slow-mo just to
highlight a cool image, but then the image doesn’t mean anything –
it just looks good. The action scenes are poorly planned-out, as the
layout of the physical space is unclear, and the number and
disposition of enemies is not given, so the battles have no shape to
them. You need to know how many bad guys there are, you need to know
what each side is trying to do and what happens if they win or lose,
otherwise your action scenes have no shape and just go on until they
arbitrarily stop.
The
themes of savage peoples battling each other in a harsh landscape is
very Sword & Sorcery, and Ghost stands out as a good basis for an
S&S hero, even if he never really seems to step up and catch
fire. The characterization in the movie is generally weak, and that
makes the whole thing also seem unimportant. This had all the
elements to make a good movie, but despite some good bits in the
action scenes and some beautiful cinematography, it remains strangely
unengaging.
No comments:
Post a Comment