The
runaway success of Star Wars in 1977 kicked off a wave of SF
and Fantasy films that carried through the 80s, as the studios
learned that visual effects had matured to the point that they could
serve as a major selling point of a film, and the phenomenon of the
“effects blockbuster” was born. The original Conan the
Barbarian was a part of this wave, even though in the end it was
pretty light on VFX. Oliver Stone’s original script had been much
more fantastical and monster-heavy.
Another
product of this wave was Dragonslayer, a strange little film
that has become kind of a cult classic – mostly due to nostalgia
from people who saw it when they were kids. A joint production
between Paramount and Disney, the move was part of a short-lived
venture whereby the big D sought to bankroll films through other
studios as an outlet for more mature subjects. The only other result
of this pairing was – believe it or not – Popeye, and when
neither that movie nor this one made any money, the whole thing fell
apart, probably leading to the formation of Touchstone pictures a few
years later.
Written
and directed by Matthew Robbins, who was a friend of George Lucas
from his film school days, Dragonslayer tells a story that is
part archetypical, and partly tries to subvert expectations, and
doesn’t manage either that well. A dragon is menacing a kingdom,
the people hold a lottery to choose virgins to sacrifice to it twice
a year to appease it, and then some of the people send a delegation
to find a wizard to come kill it. The wizard Ulrich dies almost
before his journey begins, and we follow his apprentice, Galen, as he
tries to carry out his master’s last quest.
As
Galen, Peter MacNicol is a strange choice of leading man. Short,
fuzzy-haired, and just kind of odd-looking, he doesn’t radiate any
kind of danger or intelligence, and it is telling that the rest of
his career saw him settle in as a comedic character actor, most
memorable as the camp director in Addams Family Values. He’s
just miscast, and the script seems to mostly use him for humor. In
another subversion of tropes, he doesn’t even kill the dragon, but
instead Ulrich is conveniently resurrected to battle the beast
himself, dying again in the battle.
The
movie, overall, is darker than expected, and just has a nice amount
of grit. There is blood and killing, some nudity, and the world has
a grimy, lived-in look that resembles Excalibur more than a
little – though that film had only come out a few months earlier.
We get some rather gruesome shots of one of the dragon’s victims
being devoured by her young, and overall the movie’s world is
depicted as unfriendly and dangerous, which gives it a bit of
gravitas that the lead actors don’t lend. A lot of the performers
had extensive stage backgrounds, and so there is just a rather
formal, artificial quality to the acting.
The
real star of the movie, obviously, is the dragon himself – or
herself, as there are young, so the grandly named Vermithrax
Pejorative is apparently a she. Only glimped in part through most of
the film, the dragon, when she finally emerges, is one of the most
stunning achievements in creature VFX prior to the age of CGI.
Graphic artist Dave Bunnett created the design, which was realized by
Brian Johnson – who also supervised effects on Alien and
Empire Strikes Back, among other films. The standout
sequences where the beast was moving in full view were done by Phil
Tippett using “go-motion”, which used a computer-controlled model
to move synchronized with the camera exposure, allowing for a much
more realistic look, without the jerkiness of stop-motion. Effects
legend Ken Ralston created the flying sequences, giving the dragon a
speed and deadliness in the air other flying monsters lacked.
It
is in the underground scenes, where the dragon is fully revealed more
than an hour into the 109-minute movie, that the film really takes
hold. The lair is a flame-lit nightmare underworld, filled with
steam, burning water, and dripping slime, and then there comes the
beast herself, looking more real than any other movie monster ever
had. It takes the movie a while to get to the dragon, but when they
do, they are not shy about using it.
The
pacing of the movie is slow, and the tone wanders around quite a lot,
as though the filmmakers were not quite sure what kind of film they
were making. It has elements of awkward comedy as well as a strong
atmosphere of horror, and the dragon is never depicted as anything
but terrifying. Still, it contains one of the great achievements in
practical creature effects, and in its depiction of a morally
compromised, dangerous world beset by inhuman forces, it is a kind of
Sword & Sorcery film without a real Sword & Sorcery hero at
the center of it.
Caught this on cable again recently and agree with you on everything except Peter MacNicol's fame. I know him best as Dr. Larry Fleinhardt from the underappreciated Numb3rs show. You're right about him as an odd hero, though. I imagine they chose him for his golden curls, some sort of white-boy appeal mixed with youth and inexperience. Otherwise, I'm stumped.
ReplyDeleteHe was also in Ghostbusters 2, of all things.
Delete